UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DC CIRCUIT UNITED STATES v. KANCHANALAK *    *    * No. 99-3019c November 05, 191999 *    *    * Before: WALD, SILBERMAN and TATEL, Circuit Judges. O R D E R It is ORDERED, by the Court, sua sponte, that the opinion filed on October 8, 1999, is amended as follows: Page 2, 7 lines from bottom of page: "104.8(e)" should be "104.8 " Page 3, 2nd full para., line 4: "defendants " should be "defendant " Page 4, 1st full para., line 1: "July" should be "November" Page 8, 2nd full para., line 6: " 441f" should be " 434(b)" Page 13, 1st line: "appliable" should be "applicable" Page 16, fn. 16, last line: "110.4a" should be "110.4(a)" Page 19, fn. 18, line 12: add "convention" after "political" Page 21, fn. 19 (cont.), line 13: " 441 " should be " 441e" Page 23, fn. 21, line 6: "Fullbright" should be "Fulbright" Page 24, fn. 23, line 1: "rule lenity" should be "rule of lenity" FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk Filed on November 3, 1999 CASE STATISTICS CASES: Top © Silicon Gulch 1999-2002 No Claim to Original Govt. Works